iGPT Benchmark · August 2026

Same model,
same questions.
iGPT leads on cost and time.

Eight real-inbox questions run head-to-head against a Gmail agent on the same underlying model. Pick one and watch both runs play back, exactly as they happened.

Measured Reproducible Same underlying model
8/8
Questions won

Cheaper on cost. Faster on time.

5.5×
Cheaper, up to

Same answers, less than half the cost.

1.2×
Faster in aggregate

Less wait across a full workload.

See it live
iGPT
Pick a question above to start the replay.
Tokens
Time
Cost
Gmail agent
Pick a question above to start the replay.
Tokens
Time
Cost
Speed
Benchmarks

Same model,
same questions.
iGPT wins on cost.

Eight real-inbox questions run head-to-head against a Gmail agent on the same underlying model — billing audits, vendor rankings, compliance status, board reporting.

iGPT × Gmail agent · August 2026
iGPT
Gmail agent
Loading…
Methodology

Same rules, both sides.

Everything above is measurable and reproducible.

Model
Same model on both sides.

Only the tool surface differs - iGPT's context engine vs. Gmail agent.

Sample
8 real-inbox questions.

Recorded end-to-end in August 2026. No paraphrasing, no cherry-picks.

Measurement
Measured cost and latency.

No estimation. No sampling. What you see is what the runs reported.

Quality
Human-reviewed for parity.

Both sides produced the same outcome - iGPT just spent less to get there.

Next

Same benchmark. Run it on your inbox.

Book a 20-minute walkthrough - we'll wire iGPT to your workspace and show you the same numbers on your own data.